This is a response to the disgustingly sexist rant from a pitiful excuse of a human being, an evolutionary throwback, someone who stereotypes men and demeans rape victims.

Read her disgusting diatribe here:

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/

A feminist rant, sexist in the extreme, objectifies and stereotypes men as rapists – one and all. Hypocrisy at its worst.

People like her, genuinely sicken me.

This is a handy guide for men who involve themselves with women.

I’ve recently received a bunch of comments from women who say that they aren’t domineering, manipulative, and emotionally abusive because they (1) have never psychologically abused a man and/or (2) are gay. If you are around a woman who claims to be anti-domineering, see how she stacks up.

A woman is emotionally abusive, manipulative and predatory if:

• • She has ever sexually engaged with any man whilst he was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion.
• • She has accused a man of being a slut, a cunt, a bastard, a prick or of having “buyers remorse” after a one night stand that didn’t turn into two due to her detailing her life story in a moment of post coital “bliss”
• • She has blamed a man for not putting the toilet seat down, when she has never once lifted it after her own ablutions
• • She has been to a hens night and leered at a male stripper.
• • She characterises being an heiress or an actress as a “legitimate job choice” or defends women who buy womens gossip magazines.
• • She has ever revealed that she used a one night stand to get over an ex
• • She has gone to a strip club
• • She is anti abortion
• • She is pro-choice because she believes that it will make her more sexually available
• • She watches pornography, even if it consists of two men tearing one another a new arsehole, with or without performing the polite reacharound.
• • She characterises the self-sexualising behaviour of some men, such as going to the gym and wearing singlets or driving cars with Leb-Lights on them as evidence of a mans desire to “get” a woman.
• • She laughs at stories told by her friends about the guy that they shagged who had a small cock or was a premature ejaculator
• • She expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which men are forced to perform culinary duties for a prize, sing or dance and be voted on via text message.
• • She mocks men who complain about unwanted sexual attention as being “gay”.
• • She supports “sexual liberation” and claims that more men would have sex with more women if only they were like their homosexual kin.
• • She states that men who do not want to have sex with her are “gay”.
• • She argues that certain societal behaviours toward men are “cultural” and therefore legitimate subjects of feminist attention.
• • She describes the male anatomy as “throbbing”, “pulsating”, or in any kind of metaphorical terms that imply the sheathing of a sword.
• • She defends the emotional abuse of men on grounds that they are, well, men.
• • She promotes the idea that men, as a class, are happier or more fulfilled if they work, preferably as a tradie and provide for their women.
• • She argues that only men have sexual needs and uses sex as a weapon.
• • She discusses the “types” of men that she finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean men by telling them that she does not find them sexually attractive.
• • She sexually objectifies gay men or describes herself as a “fag hag”
• • She defends these actions by saying that some men also engage in them.

So, let’s see how many men reading this know at least one woman over the age of 18 who does not fit this list. Anybody?

—-

Now of course I don’t actually believe any of what I have written in point form above, but as you can see, it is as ludicrous as what that sad oxygen thief carried on with… makes me ashamed to be human, sharing oxygen with people like that – no better than a racist, a homophobe or a religious bigot.